Letters to the Editor

Is BC Hydro’s plan really all that ‘smart’?

Editor:

What does Tom Fletcher have against people who have suffered reactions to Smart Meter radiation?

He knows that the W.H.O. has classified the radiation as a possible cancer risk, and he should know that electrohypersensitivity is a disability recognized by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Thousands of people with EHS, compromised immune systems, heart problems and other health issues have become ill as a result of the mandatory installation of wireless Smart Meters.

Mr. Fletcher seems to have convinced himself that these people are united in some plot to threaten the politics and profits of the Smart Meter project. Perhaps he thinks the pets and plants that have shown negative effects of Smart Meter radiation are conspiring as well. Or maybe he’s just a bully who thinks people with medical conditions that make them more susceptible to radiation are an easy target.

A. Churchill, Surrey

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

What to do with school boards?
 
Global warming stalled politically too
 
Afghanistan mission has left deep imprint on Langley
Abbotsford Police report 27 vehicles damaged so far in November
 
Q&A: Ex-transportation ministers criticize referendum, discuss TransLink
 
Two police officers hospitalized after being rammed by stolen truck in Surrey
Fire destroys home in Agassiz
 
Abandonment of small streams
 
Maple Ridge can do more

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 20 edition online now. Browse the archives.