Letters to the Editor

Is BC Hydro’s plan really all that ‘smart’?

Editor:

What does Tom Fletcher have against people who have suffered reactions to Smart Meter radiation?

He knows that the W.H.O. has classified the radiation as a possible cancer risk, and he should know that electrohypersensitivity is a disability recognized by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Thousands of people with EHS, compromised immune systems, heart problems and other health issues have become ill as a result of the mandatory installation of wireless Smart Meters.

Mr. Fletcher seems to have convinced himself that these people are united in some plot to threaten the politics and profits of the Smart Meter project. Perhaps he thinks the pets and plants that have shown negative effects of Smart Meter radiation are conspiring as well. Or maybe he’s just a bully who thinks people with medical conditions that make them more susceptible to radiation are an easy target.

A. Churchill, Surrey

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

New multi-user trail opens in south Aldergrove
 
Local body builder takes home second place trophy
 
Duhamel and Radford lead after short
COLUMN: What Wayne Wright dared us to do
 
Hatzic student accepts full-ride to Idaho
 
COLUMN: New Westminster City Hall the place to be on election night
Winter Magic
 
Jim Cuddy riding rails with CP Holiday Train
 
Bono hurts arm in NYC cycling accident

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 27 edition online now. Browse the archives.