Skip to content

PAINFUL TRUTH: End of the flood of sequels in sight?

Are people getting bored with the same five franchises over and over?
30406318_web1_220415-SAA-Cinemaphile-Cyrano_1
Peter Dinklage and Haley Bennett stared in Cyrano, an adaptation of the 1897 French play Cyrano de Bergerac. (Contributed)

Sequels and remakes aren’t exactly a new phenomenon.

Since we’re fast coming up on October, a.k.a. Spooky Season, you may be thinking about classic Universal monster movies – Frankenstein, The Wolf Man, The Mummy, Dracula, and so on.

If you know nothing else about these movies, you know that almost all of them had sequels. Some were excellent (Bride of Frankenstein) and some are less good (Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man).

But from the 1930s right up until the 1980s, there was one thing people knew about sequels – they were cheap cash-ins. Even in the unlikely event that they were good, they were unnecessary.

This idea was only driven home by the 1980s, an era flooded with sequels differentiated only by who Sylvester Stallone/Clint Eastwood/Arnold Schwarzenegger was blowing up this time.

But a funny thing happened a few years back.

Sequels took over everything.

READ ALSO: PAINFUL TRUTH: Aim for the EV tipping point

READ ALSO: ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ earns Tom Cruise his first $100 million opening

And prequels, and sidequels and “cinematic universes.” They’re so prolific, so popular, and so profitable that every movie studio is desperate to establish its own franchises, ones that will reliably print money, year after year. Everyone loves mutants and wizards and elves and Dune’s Bene Geserit space witches, but how many do we need!

I think this started all the way back in 1991, with Terminator 2: Judgment Day, which at the time was noted for being a rare sequel that was better than its original.

A decade later, the first Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings movies were coming out, and we were hip-deep in the Star Wars prequel trilogy.

Which is why in 1999 you could go to theatres and see domestic thrillers, rom-coms, crime dramas, historical costume dramas, and Oscar bait movies, whereas from about 2010 to 2020, you could go to theatres and see superhero movies, Star Wars movies, Harry Potter spin-offs, and Oscar bait.

And, of course, a sad attempt to create a Universal Monsters cinematic universe, with dreck like the Tom Cruise version of the The Mummy. You’d think they’d have learned their lesson from Abbot and Costello Meet the Mummy.

I think people are getting tired of this.

The financial engine that has powered the recovery of movie theatres from out of the depths of the pandemic has been mostly franchises, adaptations, and remakes.

But the movies that have people talking this year, while not hits on a massive, Spider-Man scale, are not sequels or reboots or franchise installments.

The three most interesting movies I’ve seen this year are: Cyrano, a musical starring Peter Dinklage as the swashbuckling poet; Everything Everywhere All At Once, which features talking rocks with googly eyes and frenetic martial arts sequences; and Nope, Jordan Peele’s UFO movie, which is too good to spoil here.

People get bored with things. It took them 40 years to get bored with the western, but they did. An era of blockbuster repetition, of interconnected universes, has been running for nearly 20 years, and it looks like there are finally some new ideas coming out of Hollywood.


Have a story tip? Email: matthew.claxton@langleyadvancetimes.com
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


Matthew Claxton

About the Author: Matthew Claxton

Raised in Langley, as a journalist today I focus on local politics, crime and homelessness.
Read more