(Black Press Media file)

(Black Press Media file)

LETTER: Long-time Langley resident dismayed by tree protection bylaw

Tree removal may require report by “qualified tree risk assessor.”

Dear Editor,

I am concerned that the proposed revisions to the existing bylaw are, to say the least, an overkill reaction which does nothing to address the problem that the bylaw was initially created for – that being the ‘clear cutting’ of properties that was usually done by developers which I note are not covered under this bylaw according to the information on the TOL website.

As a residential property owner in Brookswood for the past 47 years, I have not noticed any detrimental changes to the canopy, and wonder why these revisions are required at all and also what the seeming urgency is in getting these revisions passed by council ASAP?

It appears that this council’s objective is to make the removal of a tree as difficult and costly to the homeowner as possible with fees, permits and arborist’s report costs all on top of our ever-increasing annual tax bill, all of which are required regardless if a tree is dead, dying or wind blown down prior to removal.

The deletion of the option to remove one tree every 24 months further restricts the property owner who should not have to submit a documentation report prepared by a “qualified tree risk assessor.”

Who dreams this stuff up?

It’s time for some new faces and fresh ideas and realistic thinking, all of which this council is lacking.

John Barnard, Brookswood

.

• LETTER: Langley Township can’t see the forest for the trees that would be felled

• READ MORE: Langley Township plans to fight heat by adding trees


Do you have an opinion you’d like to share? Please send us a letter to the editor, including your first and last name, street address, and phone number. Email: news@langleyadvancetimes.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Langley TownshipLetter to the Editor