No public input, no public process

On July 23, 2012, Langley Township Council made a surprise and secret decision to spend a whopping $7.25 million of taxpayer’s money

Editor:

On July 23, 2012, Langley Township Council made a surprise and secret decision to spend a whopping $7.25 million of Township taxpayer’s money.

No Township taxpayer knew that Langley Township Council made this multi-million dollar decision nor did Langley Township taxpayers authorize it in any way, shape, or form because this financial decision was made outside of the approved Langley Township budget. It was never budgeted or planned for in either the 2012 Budget Bylaw or the 5 year Township financial plan, and therein lies the problem.

On July 23, 2012 Langley Township Council decided to spend $7.25 million of local taxpayers’ monies to expand the Langley Events Center (LEC) by adding a Phase I Expansion to be completed by March 2013. This decision was not included in the Township 2012 Budget nor in the 2012-2016 long-term Township Financial Plan as required by provincial legislation. In fact, this LEC expansion will be completed and the ribbon cut before the next Township budget is even approved.

The current Council’s decision to spend this unbudgeted $7.25 Million on expansion of the LEC is equivalent to a 10% increase in local taxes. No one saw this coming because it was not included in the 2012 Langley Township Budget or even in the 5-year financial plan approved by Langley Township Council in May 2012. Even I was surprised to see this on the July 23, 2012 Council “in camera” agenda since the project had been tendered and Council was asked then to award the contract. Where did this new expansion priority suddenly come from?

Since then, the $7.25 million decision has been quietly and subtly marketed to the public without Council authorization. (Refer to the Langley Times article “Events Centre set to expand”, p. 4, September 4, 2012). No Council member was able to say anything about the expansion because the whole matter was behind closed doors until today.

Expanding the LEC is not necessarily a bad idea as development of our youth and Sports Tourism is very good for the future of Langley but the process that Langley Township Council used to reach this decision stinks.

The process stinks because:

• There was no public input ever on this project or on spending this money.

• Langley Township taxpayers are footing 100% of this $7.25 Million. There are no new “financial” partners regardless of what was said in recent press releases.

• The project was tendered without Council approval. Council approval was only given after the tender was presented to Council. So when did this LEC expansion become such a high priority of this Council and why?

• How can $7.25 million be spent in one year when it has not been included in the publicly approved budget and 5-year strategic financial plan? How can the monies be spent before the next budget is even approved?

• Why is Council selling off so much of Township’s land assets (like Glen Valley lands) while at the same time saying to local community groups in Glen Valley and Aldergrove that “you need to help us fundraise” to meet financial commitments for a new pool in Aldergrove when the majority of public land sales are probably going to end up financing the Willoughby LEC project not the Aldergrove pool project?    • Why does the Willoughby project get to cue-jump the Aldergrove project? The Aldergrove pool project has been on the books for over 10 years now while this Events Center expansion came out of the blue. Where are the priorities? If we had all this extra money, why didn’t we fast-track the new pool in Aldergrove instead?

Something is very wrong here and needs to be fixed. What are the priorities? Who controls the priorities? As servants of the public, where is the ethical and transparent leadership? How did this happen? And who drove this secret agenda?

Such unbudgeted secret multi-million dollar expenditures should not be allowed to happen in any municipality without any public input or taxpayer scrutiny. Period.

In my opinion, what has happened here is highly unethical, if not illegal. It simply does not meet the “smell test”.

Kim Richter, Councillor, Township of Langley

Just Posted

Langley single mom given aid to achieve what’s in her heart

Each year Langley Soroptimists give grants to local mothers going back to school

VIDEO: Highway One to be widened east to 264th Street in Langley

The $235 million project includes upgrades to overpasses and a rail bridge

Three Langley communities included in 30 kilometre Canada Day parade route

The expanded parade is being organized by a sub-committee of the Aldergrove Fair.

U.S. inn owner, charged with smuggling people into Canada, granted bail

Robert Joseph Boule ordered to turn away anyone indicating a plan to enter Canada illegally

Suspect stole lingerie in Langley heist

Langley RCMP is also looking for someone who bought $6,000 in goods with a stolen credit card

Canada privacy watchdog taking Facebook to court

If the court application is successful, it could lead to modest fines and an order for Facebook to revamp its privacy

One million recyclable bottles “lost” daily in B.C., foundation says

387 million beverage containers didn’t make it back into the province’s regulated deposit refund system in 2017

VIDEO: B.C.’s waving granny gets incredible send-off from school kids

Tinney Davidson has been waving at students on their way to school for over 11 years, but is moving in a month

Struggling B.C. adoption agency elects new board that intends to keep it open

The previous board announced that Choices would close May 31

Woman, 60, charged in connection to thefts at YVR

RCMP believe the foreign national is part of a larger organized theft group

Vancouver man, 19, charged in human trafficking case involving teen girl

The 16-year-old girl was reported missing and later discovered in Vancouver

Worst 10 bus routes in Metro Vancouver for rider complaints

TransLink releases list, with Route 319 at the top

Mayors, First Nations chiefs, urge ‘immediate action’ on new Massey crossing

Joint letter asks province to move up timeline, consider only eight-lane tunnel options

Bus driver assault in Vancouver once again raises safety concerns

A 49-year-old Surrey man was released on a promise to appear in court. No charge has been laid

Most Read